UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH BLOGS

The Office of Undergraduate Research sponsors a number of grant programs, including the Circumnavigator Club Foundation’s Around-the-World Study Grant and the Undergraduate Research Grant. Some of the students on these grants end up traveling and having a variety of amazing experiences. We wanted to give some of them the opportunity to share these experiences with the broader public. It is our hope that this opportunity to blog will deepen the experiences for these students by giving them a forum for reflection; we also hope these blogs can help open the eyes of others to those reflections/experiences as well. Through these blogs, perhaps we all can enjoy the ride as much as they will.

Follow our research journey at www.spiritedpodcast.com

Hey listeners! We encourage you to visit our website www.spiritedpodcast.com for frequent updates and images from our research trip. Also visit www.facebook.com/spiritedpodcast for more fun!

 

What makes a story believable? And why do ghost stories always seem to stick? Sarah Walther and Jared Zvonar are two Northwestern undergrad students who want to find out. Follow along as they roadtrip New England this summer, creating a podcast that explores ghost stories and the rationale behind belief.

First post!

Measures of electrical activity from the brain provide great insight into neural processes related to sensation and perception.  An important subset of this field of neuroscience seeks to understand how different brain processes respond to different stimuli. A frequent and ubiquitous current stimulus is the mobile phone (MP). Research in the Suzuki and Grabowecky lab in the last decade suggests pervasive influences of auditory-visual interactions on attention. This blog documents my research as I learn, analyze, and compare brain activity in response to visual and auditory stimuli from the patient’s own MP and from other sources in the room (e.g., television or computer).

First start!

This summer I will be living in Evanston, spending my days in Dr. Maggie Osburn’s isotope geobiology lab and Dr. Yarrow Axford’s paleolimnology lab. What motivates me to spend eight-hour days in a room with minimal windows (apart from grant funding…)? I am looking to answer questions about how Greenland’s climate has changed over the past several thousand years—questions that are increasingly relevant as we see rapid melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet, the largest ice mass in the Northern hemisphere. In the process of seeking understanding of Greenland’s paleoclimate (its climate in the past), my day-to-day work will be, mostly, banal. However, I’m excited to gradually assemble a better picture of past climate parameters (it’s hard to know yet, but I might be able to learn about how things like temperature, humidity, or the source of precipitation have shifted for Greenland over thousands of years), and maybe even share with a reader or two.

 

An Intro to Kampala – Urban Agriculture & Traffic

In my everyday life, I know I take a lot for granted: in addition to the big things, like my health, my family, friends, etc., I also don’t think twice about indoor bathrooms and drinkable tap water. Honestly, I’m grateful for my past ability to travel so much that small differences like those are quite easy to adjust to. However, in Kampala, the most difficult thing for me to get used to is the traffic. I’ve never been so incredibly appreciative of the L train in Chicago. Or stoplights…

 

I’m staying with a wonderful, caring host family, where I have a plethora of family members looking out for me and providing me with touches of home—like leftover birthday cake this morning (a tradition in my own family, of course!). However, I must admit I was slightly naïve in not figuring out where exactly they live before I arrived. This morning, I woke up at six, maybe slightly offended my host sister by skipping the bucket (shower) she offered to fill up for me, ate my breakfast as quickly as possible (a more difficult task than expected since the peanut butter here is a bit more…sticky…than I’m used to), and sped walked past the schoolchildren on my way to the common form of public transportation here, a matutu, or “taxi.”

 

It’s now 7:48, and my taxi is inching towards the Old Car Park in the city center. I suppose the Old Car Park is the Grand Central-equivalent in Kampala (just substitute trains with taxis). Or maybe it’s more like Penn Station… Regardless, it’s where thousands of taxis congregate in the city center. The giant parking lot is filled with signs denoting different loading “stages,” which state in what direction the taxis lined up behind it are heading. The next taxi to leave gets a more specific sign placed on top of it until it is appropriately filled and heads out. Each taxi has fourteen seats and thus, legally fits fourteen people. Not so legally, it fits way more…

 

In regards to my research on food systems here, however, I’ve found that “informal” is a more respectful and appropriate term to use than “illegal”—specifically when referring to unlicensed street vendors and markets. So, I’d rather say that taxi I came to town in this morning was just… very informal.

 

Also in regards to my research on food systems, just within my first few days here, I’ve learned an incredible amount. Before I arrived in Kampala, I read a lot about the significance of urban and peri-urban agriculture (UPA) to the city’s food supply—that is, the large proportion of food it supplied to the city. Then, in my first two days here, many qualified researchers and scientists informed me that 95 percent of the city’s food supply comes from beyond the city’s urban and peri-urban areas.[1] When I first heard this, I was a bit taken aback—I thought a large research pivot was at bay. However, over the past few days, I’ve learned more and more about the significance of UPA to the city’s food supply and food security, beyond the simply the amount of food it provides.

 

In case you didn’t check out that handy dandy table I included in my last blog post, my definition of food security includes four key criteria:

  1. Physical availability of food
  2. Economic and physical access to food
  3. Nutrition of consumption practices (and access to a variety of nutritious food)
  4. Availability/access to safe food
  5. Stability of the other four dimensions

 

UPA may currently comprise only five percent of Kampala’s food supply, yet it certainly increases people’s economic and physical access to a diverse variety of healthy foods, given that the most popular UPA products are vegetables and poultry. Certain government programs also promote UPA to increase specific, vulnerable urban communities’ food security. Other government programs train urban and peri-urban farmers how to maximize UPA production in very limited spaces. Complementary private and government-sponsored research to Kampala’s UPA developments also increase the reliability of urban and peri-urban farmers’ yields despite climate uncertainty, severe weather events, and land development pressures.

 

Despite my misconceptions regarding how much food UPA sources to Kampala, the city still serves as a baseline for my research: unlike in my other study cities, most of Kampala’s food supply is sourced domestically. Every person whom I ask about the food system here invariably begins describing to me the distinct agricultural regions throughout the country. Each region has a certain food it produces, which is determined by people’s preferences and the natural environment (but mostly the natural environment). In fact, one researcher at the Kampala Capital City Authority’s agricultural research center, Kyanja, said that’s how he would define a “local food system” in Uganda: by the crops/livestock a certain region produces.

 

Once crops are harvested in regions throughout Uganda, they are typically brought by distributors to be sold at key markets around the city, like Owino, Nakasero, and Kalerwe Markets. Crops that require processing, like grains and corn, are also brought to the city to be processed, and livestock are brought to the city to be slaughtered. After processing, these food products are distributed to markets within Kampala and back out to the regions from which they came. There are many possible distribution routes for all food products once they arrive at the key city markets: they can be sold to individuals, restaurants, hotels, or other secondary market distributors, and then the chain continues… Yet despite the seeming complexity of these city food chains, the very common farmer-distributor-market seller-household/restaurant/hotel food supply chain is still extremely streamlined compared relative to how food gets distributed to supermarkets in the US, for example.

 

In my first week here, I’ve spoken to a number of researchers, government officials, and program coordinators involved in urban agriculture in Kampala, at the following organizations:

 

**Please note that the following sections ended up being way longer than I initially intended, so … TL;DR

 

National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO), Kawanda Branch –

 

  • I interviewed soil scientists who aim to increase climate-smart farming throughout Uganda, and thus contribute to the country’s food security amidst environmental change and uncertainty by conducting research through direct engagement with farmers in urban and peri-urban areas.
  • These researchers also explained to me how the food systems within Uganda is like a spider web with Kampala as the agricultural processing and distribution center: food comes in from specialized rural agricultural regions to Kampala and then redistributed back out. Therefore, food is widely available in Kampala, even if it is not physically and economically accessible to all residents.

Model growing of hybrid matooke crop at NARO Kawanda

Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) Community Involvement & Gender Department, Kampala Division –

 

  • The KCCA’s Department of Agribusiness runs a program that targets vulnerable communities throughout Kampala, and provides them with comprehensive financial, technical, and advisory support for them to start their own urban agriculture enterprises.
  • Two key challenges to the program include land development pressure (given that many program beneficiaries do not own the land they farm on) and accessibility of authorized, efficient food distribution channels for the beneficiaries to sell their food to. To overcome that second challenge, the KCCA encourages the development of neighborhood farmers’ cooperatives, since urban farmers joined together can gain access to formal markets that individual, small-scale, urban farmers can’t. However, these cooperatives have not yet been realized.

 

KCCA Kyanja Agricultural Resource Center –

 

  • The goal of KCCA’s Kyanja Agricultural Resource Center is to train urban farmers how to best grow crops in small spaces, to ultimately increase urban farmers’ productivity and secure their income.
  • Kyanja provides a sort of marketplace for urban farmers from all over the city to buy high quality agricultural products and inputs, and it also provides a wide arrange of extension services. It trains all sorts of urban farmers (no matter their income) on best practices related to poultry, piggery, aquaponics (to raise catfish), mushroom growing, and vegetable growing.
  • Kyanja hopes to soon provide farmers with increased access to proper food distribution networks, which may occur at the center and in poultry distribution centers, which program coordinators hope to develop in each district.
  • When I was touring Kyanja, the Director of Communications at the KCCA bought two chickens and 44 catfish, and he put them in his trunk for the car ride home (the catfish in two plastic bags).

(Coincidentally) toured Kyanja with the Director of Communications of the KCCA and other officials from the Office of the Prime Minister

NARO, Mukono Branch –

 

  • NARO Mukono’s urban agriculture program aims to teach UPA farmers how to maximize the productivity of vegetable growing on small plots of agricultural land to provide the farmers with future food, income, and employment. They do so through community-based training and providing more comprehensive support to select urban farmers.
  • Since the project’s inception, the NARO Mukono team, along with its community based organization partners and support from local agricultural and political leaders, has trained 5,000 farmers and provided 20,000 farmers with free urban farming materials.
  • To combat the same, previously discussed, issues with lack of available, formal markets for urban farmers, the NARO Mukono urban agriculture team dedicates a large portion of their time to assisting farmers in finding potential markets for their products, such as formal food markets or direct buyers at places like universities and restaurants.

Sign says “Food Towers: Evaluating performance of small gardening technologies for urban farming” at NARO Mukono

_____

 

 

And if you are still reading, I wish you sincere congratulations. But also, please feel free to ditch at any time. I will not be offended. It’s past 10 pm here, so it’s certainly my own bedtime, and perhaps it’s yours too…

 

And here’s the full version—woohoo:

 

National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO) – Kawanda

 

I was privileged to have my first interview in Kampala with a team of soil scientists at NARO’s Kawanda branch. NARO’s mission is “to enhance the contribution of agricultural research to sustainable agricultural productivity, sustained competitiveness, economic growth, food security, and poverty eradication.” The researchers I spoke with specifically aim to increase climate-smart farming in Uganda. In recent years, they have made great strides to their research away from the lab and instead towards meaningful engagement and interventions with farmers on the farmers’ own land.

 

Indeed, most of NARO Kawanda’s research is focused in agricultural areas—and NARO researchers do not consider urban and peri-urban Kampala an agricultural area. Regardless, the soil scientist team has recently conducted some interventions with urban farmers on a variety of projects, such as sack farming, hydroponics, and mushroom growing.

 

Since my interview with the soil scientists at NARO was my first interview here, the researchers provided me with some general conceptions of the city and its UPA. They explained to me how Kampala’s city boundary was originally delineated as reaching 3 km from the city center, yet it is continuously expanding. They would now describe the city as reaching 15 km from the center.

 

Furthermore, while the researchers emphasized how urban expansion is one of the biggest threats to Kampala’s food system, they also emphasized to me how UPA is still not that important to Kampala’s general food supply… They explained how most of Kampala’s food comes from “deep rural” areas, which are more than 100 km away from the city. (However, they laughed and told me that if I drove just 30 km away from the city, I would think I was in a very rural area. That was soon confirmed.)

 

Other key insight these researchers (and my research assistant, Ismail) provided me with during our general discussion was about how Uganda’s food networks function more generally—“like a spider web” (i.e., from rural agricultural regions to Kampala and back to other rural regions)! Therefore, food is generally very available in Kampala—and that checks #1 on my list of food security components. Furthermore, food in Kampala is generally more economically and physically accessible than food in nearby towns, given how Kampala is the country’s agricultural distribution center. Nonetheless, food insecurity in Kampala is still a prevalent issue, and that’s where UPA often comes in—it provides a direct supply of food and additional income to urban residents in need.

 

While NARO’s soil scientists’ research was mostly unrelated to UPA, the ultimate goals of their department—to ensure Ugandans with consistent access to sufficient, nutritious food amidst impending environmental change and uncertainty—is quite relevant to my own research. Furthermore, my visit to NARO only began to demonstrate to me the very large quantity of government and private resources in Uganda that are dedicated to increasing and maintaining agricultural productivity throughout the country, both in urban and rural areas.

 

(Next week, I will meet with the women in charge of the Biosciences Department at NARO Kawanda, who will provide me with more specific insight into how researcher hope to increase the nutritional value of food supplies within

 

Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) Community Involvement & Gender Department, Kampala Division –

 

I met with Mugisha Abdu, the Director of Agribusiness and National Agricultural Advisory Service (NAADS) Coordinator for Kampala Central Division,[2] whose position falls under the KCCA’s Community Involvement and Gender Program. The KCCA’s vision is to make Kampala a vibrant, attractive, and sustainable city. According to Mr. Abdu, its key values include land care, innovation, production and markets, and food security, and its mandate is to increase food availability, nutrition, and income security to Kampala residents. The KCCA determines what are appropriate programs to do so by first conducting interventions, through which city officials meet with political, religious, and other community leaders on a neighborhood basis. They inquire as to what exactly people need and develop their community develop programs based on communities’ specific needs.

 

Mr. Abdu has been running the Kampala Central Division’s urban agriculture enterprise since 2012. The program targets vulnerable and disadvantaged communities, such as single women, unemployed youths, elderly people, and people with HIV/AIDS, and aims to increase their food security. KCCA provides select program beneficiaries with comprehensive support for them develop their own urban agricultural enterprise: vegetable farming,[3] mushroom growing, poultry farming, dairy farming, or creating value-added food products. The beneficiaries receive advisory, monetary, and technical support throughout the development and upkeep of their individual enterprises. Ultimately, individuals may either consumer or sell their agricultural products, which increases their direct access to food and provides them with a source of additional income.

 

The KCCA’s agricultural enterprise program has accomplished much over the past five years. The Central Division alone has sponsored 500 beneficiaries, and Mr. Abdu has personally observed many instance in which people’s ownership of these enterprises significantly improved their livelihoods. However, one increasingly pressing challenge to the program’s sustainability and expansion is land development pressure within Kampala.

 

The program aims to provide people with the knowledge, skills, and equipment they need to run a successful agricultural enterprise within a very limited space (e.g. somebody’s backyard or the space between people’s homes and the road). However, given the program’s target beneficiaries—individuals’ vulnerable to food insecurity—the beneficiaries often do not own the land they develop their enterprises on. Therefore, it is common that even program participants’ one-square meter vegetable plots are threatened by the land owners’ future development. Mr. Abdu described numerous cases in which his team went to check on their beneficiaries (ongoing monitoring and support is one key stage of project implementation), and the bountiful chicken coops or vegetable plots they had observed just one week before were gone—and often, the beneficiaries were too.

 

Another challenge to small-scale urban agriculture within Kampala is for urban farmers to gain access to efficient, legal channels to sell their food products through. The small-scale agricultural enterprises that the KCCA sponsors most often do not produce enough food products or provide enough income for the urban farmers to sell to licensed city markets. Many urban farmers overcome this barrier by selling their products through informal means, such as outside the gates of city markets, through small stands on the sides of roads, or at informal markets. The KCCA hopes to mitigate unlicensed product sales by supporting the development of agricultural cooperatives. These cooperatives, through which community residents involved in the same form of agribusiness can connect, would increase the day-to-day support and assistance urban farmers receive. They would also provide small-scale urban farmers the means to sell their products at the major markets within town: while one farmer may not have enough chickens to sell at a large market, all the poultry farmers in a neighborhood certainly would.

 

 

KCCA Kyanja Agricultural Resource Center –

 

The goal of KCCA’s Kyanja Agricultural Resource Center, founded in 2013, is to train urban farmers how to best grow crops in small spaces, to ultimately increase urban farmers’ productivity and secure their income. The center is located on the outskirts of Central Kampala, and it has five main projects: poultry, piggery, aquaponics (to raise catfish), mushroom growing, and vegetable growing. While Kyanja functions largely as a business—it sells each of its agricultural products to urban farmers throughout the city—Kyanja’s mission is rooted in enhancing urban farmers’ livelihoods. Each Wednesday and Sunday, the center is open to the public for trainings on a variety of urban agricultural techniques—e.g. food towers, sack gardens, green houses, aquaponics—and best practices regarding each the types of product it produces itself.

 

However, Kyanja’s work and mission extends far beyond its own site. Kato Godfrey, Head of Crop Science at Kyanja, described how the resource center also provides a variety of extension services to all types of urban farmers (of all incomes) throughout the city. Its team provides personal consultation and monitoring of people’s individual urban farming operations. It also donates supplies to individuals that have demonstrated sufficient resources (capital and land, though the minimum capital requirements are only about 30 USD) and interest in/commitment to their urban farming activities.

 

Mr. Godfrey identifies the greatest barrier for urban farming in Kampala as lack of space. He often meets people who want to begin urban agriculture projects but simply don’t have the few square meters they need to make it worth their while. Nonetheless, he is confidence that the KCCA is well-suited to respond to Kampala residents’ needs and provide them with the other forms of training (e.g. how to bake or make crafts) to continue increasing the city’s food security.

 

On my second visit to Kyanja, during the Saturday open tour hours, I was very privileged to run into two government officials who were touring the center themselves. Throughout the tour, they verbalized their great appreciation for Kyanja’s “illustrious goals” and good work. They also discussed possibilities of future developments to ensure satisfaction for those who visit the center, such as a waiting area and a café.

 

One future development their discussed that I see as a key step in the KCCA’s continued support of small-scale urban agriculture is the development of cold rooms in each city district. District-wide slaughterhouses/distribution centers could overcome current challenges farmers experience in finding proper distribution channels for their agricultural products. Furthermore, Mr. Godfrey hopes to supplement these future cold rooms with development of a formalized system at Kyanja. He hopes farmers will soon be able to all types of agricultural products (not just poultry) directly to the center, and the center could sell them to other buyers. These guaranteed, formalized food networks would increase farmers food security and livelihoods by providing them with reliable access to buyers.

 

 

NARO – Mukono

 

The goal of NARO Mukono’s urban agriculture program is to teach UPA farmers how to maximize the productivity of small plots of agricultural land to provide the farmers with future food, income, and employment. They do so through community-based training and providing more comprehensive support (i.e. supplying materials and continued advisory services) to select urban farmers. NARO focuses primarily on backyard gardening techniques, such as buckets, sacks, food towers, and hanging gardens. The program’s agricultural technician explained why the program focuses on vegetable production: vegetables can be very productive even when grown in small spaces, vegetables grow quickly, vegetable farming’s required inputs are low cost, and vegetables are healthy.

 

Since the project’s inception, the NARO Mukono team, along with its community based organization partners and support from local agricultural and political leaders, has trained 5,000 farmers and provided 20,000 farmers with free materials.

 

To combat the same, previously discussed, issues with lack of available, formal markets for urban farmers, the NARO Mukono center itself assists farmers in finding potential markets for their products. Monica, the program’s agricultural technician, described how she could spend all day on the phone assisting farmers with sales. Despite the time-consuming nature of this part of her job, she has been successful in helping urban farmers connect with formal food markets and in cultivating relationships between urban farmers and other buyers, like universities and restaurants.

 

Monica’s dreams that NARO Mukono will one day train and assist 500,000 urban farmers. She believes also believes it would be very reasonable to source all of Kampala’s vegetables locally, and that that would both increase urban residents’ income and health.

 

[1] I’ve recently encountered a variety of statistics regarding where Kampala’s food is sourced, yet I still have not come across enough information to cross-check the numbers. Regardless, I’m becoming increasingly skeptical of the ‘95 percent’ statistic. For example, one International Development Research Centre (IRDC) sited that 70 percent of poultry found in Kampala is sourced from UPA.

[2] Kampala, Uganda’s capital, is administered by the Kampala Capital City Authority. While there is a “Lord Mayor” of the whole city, the KCCA is also divided into five divisions, each which has its own mayor.

[3] Here and in the following sections, “vegetables” refers to crops like tomatoes, onions, leafy greens, cabbage, carrots, cucumber, etc.

Beginning the Circumnavigation…

Well, I’ve been in Canada for about half an hour now, and I’m about to leave what has briefly been my first country outside of the United States on my circumnavigation around the world this summer. Granted, the Circumnavigator Scholars grant does not permit North American countries to count as a part of the five-country, three-continent minimum of the research trip. Nonetheless, I made sure to make this Canadian pit stop meaningful: in the spirit of my local food research theme, I got a maple-dipped donut from Tim Horton’s. And the majority of the world’s maple syrup supply is from Canada, so probability is that my donut’s ingredients were source nationally, if not locally? (Note to self to Google whether there is any actual maple product in Tim Horton’s donuts.)

I suppose my association of Tim Horton’s with unique Canadian charm begs the question, do I think a giant, multi-national corporation can sell true “local” food? Certainly, locals (Canadians) drink Tim Horton’s coffee. The chain has a reputation for its quintessential Canadian-ism. Yet, in terms of my research, I’d have to do an amount of Google before I could determine whether the donut I ate was “local.” (I doubt it was.)

For my research, I’ve defined local food systems (LFS) as the following:

Local food systems are complex socio-ecological systems encompass food production, processing, and sales within a defined geographical area (Balász 2012). However, given the vastly different characteristics of the cities in question, the exact radius around each city center within which agricultural production is considered “local” will vary greatly. Often, LFS can be best defined by what they are not, or characterized in contrast to complex, long food supply chains that span within and across countries. They are also often “oriented towards a sustainability that is multidimensional: economic, environmental, and social” (Corrado 2014).

 

I’ve consciously employed a lenient definition of LFS to be able to investigate the most poignant forms of LFS in each very different city I will visit. Nonetheless, my ultimate intentions are to explore food supply chains and sources that function independently of longer national or international food supply chains.

Furthermore, my research specifically investigates the extent to which LFS hold the potential to foster urban food security—or provide more economically and physically accessible safe, nutritious food to urban residents. To begin, LFS may increase the availability of food supplies to a certain urban neighborhood by providing agricultural production and food sources that wouldn’t otherwise exist. LFS may foster general economic regeneration in communities or additional, direct sources of income to urban residents. LFS may also provide a learning environment for people to increase their awareness of nutritional practices and provide a social space that advances a community’s social cohesion and ability to productively tackle economic challenges. awareness about the lacks plentiful, nutritious food, creating social learning environments. LFS may also do a whole bunch of other things to increase urban food security, which are detailed in the fun table below!

 

Food Security Component Local Food Systems Characteristics
1. Physical availability of food ·      Increases total food production within an urban region

o   Increases the productivity of existing production spaces that distribute food to urban residents

o   Increases the number of production centers that distribute food to urban residents

o   Increases the land in a neighborhood that is used for food production

2. Economic and physical access to food ·      Contributes to local employment and economic regeneration

·      Increases disposable income of urban residents

o   Provides direct income

o   Increases access to food through self-production

o   Provides food that is less expensive than available substitutes

·      Provides food in a geographic area that is accessible to more urban residents

3. Nutrition of consumption practices ·      Provides an educational space to learn about health and nutrition

·      Provides specific nutritional programming/education activities

·      Provides a wider variety of food products/enable consumers to increase their dietary diversity

·      Provides customers with greater trust in the quality components of their food

4. Food safety ·      Provides a source of safe food in the case that non-local food supplies are contaminated

·      Provides a safety net (e.g. insurance) in case food provided by the LFS is unsafe

·      (-) Provides people with (local) food that may be more likely to be unsafe/contaminated due to its growth in urban regions or lack of safety regulations

5. Stability of the other four dimensions ·      To provide resilience during type of shock, the organization…

·      Natural/environmental:

o   Employs technology that is resistant to environmental shocks and/or climate change

o   Has physical barriers that defend the organization against natural disasters or inclement weather

·      Sociopolitical:

o   Funding/revenue comes from non-political or socially independent non- sources

o   Revenue streams are secure irrespective of changing social trends

o   Organization/food is accessible to people no matter that social or political affiliations

·      Economic:

o   Funding is provided by a financially secure, sustainable source

o   Revenue is secure irrespective of declines to other economic sectors

o   Revenue does not decrease if consumers’ income decreases

o   Provides consumers with an educational space to learn how to produce their own food

o   Provides consumers with increased direct or disposable income

o   Provide consumers with affordable food

Nevertheless, there are many reasons why longer food supply chains also are crucial for ensuring global food security. LFS also have a number of shortcomings in regards to maintaining a city’s food security: a region’s excessive reliance on food produced within one geographic area can make communities’ food supplies more vulnerable environmental shocks; local food systems may not promote ethical nor economic solidarity due to their lower productivity and ability to support human intellect and capital; and people’s beliefs that local food is more environmentally or economically sustainable often ignores factors economic and environmental costs of production, transport, capital, and labor.

 

Furthermore, abstaining from criticisms of LFS, there are many inherent positive characteristics of long food supply chains–think countries capitalizing upon their natural resource endowments, innovative technologies, and social or intellectual capital to take part in a global collaboration towards a common good. In fact, I just watched a short documentary on this Brussels Airlines flight titled “Aid for Sustainable Development: Exports are Good for the Local Community.” This short video details how growing French (green) beans for export in Kenya enhances the country’s food system: the crops exported are subject to health and safety regulations that they wouldn’t otherwise be and those growing them receive training in good agricultural practices that they otherwise wouldn’t receive. Because those green beans not deemed high enough quality to meet European quality standards, they get sold to local markets and thus increase the quantity, diversity, and safety of food supplied to Kenyans. And then the agricultural leaders who have gained the advanced training are able to disseminate their knowledge through a variety of agricultural networks.

While I’m not visiting Kenya and my research does not focus on international supply chain alternatives, I thought the fact that this video offered on the Brussels Airlines entertainment system—nestled in between “Horrible Bosses” and many French movies—was quite poignant… And indicative of the large variety of perspectives I’m sure I will encounter over the next thirteen weeks.

 

Anyhow, despite how surreal it still feels, my circumnavigation is currently underway. One out of sixteen flights done. My next layover is in Brussels, and I’ll be in Kampala, Uganda by tomorrow night. My go-to line for the past few weeks when people asked about my upcoming trip was to state how surreal I felt that I was leaving on such a ridiculous (amazing) trip so soon. Still, each time I list off the seven countries I will be visiting over the next thirteen weeks, I surprise myself. Granted, this all did start feeling a bit more real when I realized I forgot my headphones, turned ‘Data Roaming’ off on my phone, and alas, when my Discover cared got rejected at Tim Horton’s. I also think I’ll be further invested in rewriting (to make legible) my interview guides for my research in Uganda once I turn in the rest of my finals… And maybe at the next airport, I’ll have enough time to connect to the WiFi and download the few research methods books I’ve been meaning to take a look back at before I begin the international component of my research. And also text my mom.

 

 

 

Hi, everyone!

Hi everyone! I’ll be headed to Cyprus soon for my first time out of the country! Wish me luck– here’s hoping I make it on the plane, honestly.

Ready to go

I got the Undergraduate Language Grant from the Office of Undergraduate Research to study Arabic language in American in Beirut, Lebanon. Let me show you the magnificent scenery and stories in this country.

CityFood Symposium: Street Food Around the World

Last week, I was granted an incredible opportunity to ditch three days of school to go to New York and talk about food. More specifically, I listened to a group of incredible food studies academics present their research related to street food and engaged in (well, mostly still listened to) conversation and budding collaboration regarding topics of food consumption and provision in cities around the world.

While the CityFood Symposium’s specific topic, street food, is not the exact focus of my upcoming research, it was an incredibly informative and fun opportunity to glimpse into the advanced academic world of food studies. Furthermore, key, underlying questions posed at the Symposium, like the following, are indeed integral to my research: How are urban residents fed and cared for? How do they craft their livelihoods from that?

The conference attendees presented on topics ranging from mapping street food vendors on Roosevelt Avenue in Queens, NYC, to the performative and theatrical aspects of food trucks, to the spitting of paan (otherwise known as betel quid) in London. Below, I’ve listed some of my greatest takeaways of the conference:

1) The social sciences may not be emotive or sensory-based enough to accurately depict street food (or any food) research.

  • In the final round-table discussion of the conference, numerous academics mentioned how the social sciences fail to capture certain emotional and sensory-based elements of street food. I found this (repeated) comment especially interesting given my own background in Environment Sciences and Economics (arguably, the “hardest” social science). I already thought I was making significant strides towards understanding the more personal, emotional, and sensual part of food studies by taking anthropology courses and approaching my economics-based research… very carefully….

 

  • I’m currently enrolled in an independent study course through the Northwestern’s Economics Department to help prepare for my summer research. While I understand conducting research on local food systems and food security will demand research methods that span beyond classical economics, I thought I was approaching my Econ Independent Study mindfully enough—particularly given my enrollment in a humanities course last quarter that was all about the importance cross-disciplinary interactions between economics and the humanities. However, I now realize there is always something I’m going to be leaving out.

2) People are one of the most essential components of a “food system.”*

  • After a recent conversation with an analyst at the International Review Board (IRB) office at Northwestern, I determined that my upcoming research is likely not human subjects research because my research objectives are related to understanding food systems rather than individuals involved in the food systems. (For reference, if my research were to be designated at human subjects research, I’d have to undergo a very thorough review process to ensure that it  would not threaten the rights or welfare of any subjects whom I conducted research on. I’d also be subject to a number of restrictions throughout the duration of the research.)

 

  • After attending the CityFood Symposium, I became a bit more dubious about the fact that I my research is not human-subjects based. Many conference presentations emphasized the importance of understanding individual experiences to fully understand the broader cultural and economic implications of street food. Numerous researchers, for example, presented their in-depth ethnographic studies specific street food vendors. Then, in the last roundtable discussion, somebody stated something to the nature ofis co, “a food system is composed of people.” So, maybe I will be able to surpass the need for IRB review but still give appropriate regard to the individuals involved in the local food networks I will study?… (although I definitely need to spend some more time thinking about this).

3) Interviewing vendors at night markets (or people are involved in other means of distributing locally-source food) is legitimate, valuable research.

  • As I’ve been planning my own research agenda in more detail, I been having much more success getting in touch with food systems entrepreneurs and local food distributors than academics and government officials interested/involved in topics of local food systems and food security. Numerous presentations throughout the conference, such as Lynne Milgram’s presentation on her paper, What happens when we take the “street” out of “street food”?: refashioning Philippine street foods and vending, demonstrated to me particular social science research methods that seems very similar to what I like to do in my free time—talk to people who produce and consume food in various locations around the world. While I don’t mean to discredit or degrade Milgram’s or any other conference attendee’s research, I am excited to learn about the many possible paths my upcoming research can take that will be both well founded and fun.

Finally, a huge thanks to Professor Hil-lei Hobart and Dr. Krishnendu Ray for inviting me to the conference, with particular gratitude to Professor Hobart for letting me skip her class to attend. Also, thank you to my parents for housing me and to Six Blocks Bakery for providing me with a great makeshift standing desk in the LaGuardia Airport as I wait for my 4-hour delayed flight back to Chicago.

**I’ve recently learned that many academics do not like the term “food system,” but for the time being, I will use it and defined it as “an interconnected web of activities, resources and people that extends across all domains involved in providing human nourishment and sustaining health, including production, processing, packaging, distribution, marketing, consumption and disposal of food. The organization of food systems reflects and responds to social, cultural, political, economic, health and environmental conditions and can be identified at multiple scales, from a household kitchen to a city, county, state or nation.

Source: Grubinger, Vern, Linda Berlin, Elizabeth Berman, Naomi Fukagawa, Jane Kolodinsky, Deborah Neher, Bob Parsons, Amy Trubek, and Kimberly Wallin. University of Vermont Transdisciplinary Research Initiative Spire of Excellence Proposal: Food Systems. Proposal, Burlington: University of Vermont, 2010.

Take Two!

So, that last blog post on the train ended short because I fell asleep. This morning I traced out the route of my upcoming circumnavigation on a map for my current hosts in Virginia, and they commented on how long many of the flights are I’ll be taking. I’m generally incapable of napping during the day, but my body makes some serious exceptions when I’m on buses and trains and planes. I suppose that’s mostly a good thing, given that I’ll be able to sleep to occupy my time on many of the longer travel legs this summer. However, I also think I should work on my ability to write a blogpost in a moving vehicle without falling asleep on my keyboard.

 

In the past few days, I’ve booked two Airbnbs and one hostel out of the ten or eleven total places I’ll stay. While it felt great to get a few checks going on that list, I’m currently caught up in some stress about getting a new passport. I only have nine blank pages left in my current passport, and only six labeled “Visa” at the top of the page. While that should be enough for my travel this summer, I really don’t want to have to make a pitstop at a U.S. Embassy while I’m abroad to try to get a new passport. I’m bummed I didn’t think about this sooner, but with the expedited passport process, I should be able to get my passport and then my Ugandan Visa (luckily, the only physical visa I will need in my passport for this summer) in on time.

 

Beyond trip logistics, a few recent experiences of mine have certainly affirmed my chosen research topic: food. I believe my very stimulating conversation with my Uber driver to O’Hare last week epitomizes how universal and pressing topics of local food and food security are. (My Uber driver and I discussed everything from the Uber driver’s experiences hunting and gathering with Indigenous Malaysians to why there aren’t apple trees planted in all Chicago parkways.)

 

More recently, here in rural Virginia, I’ve eaten home-caught/hunted fish and venison for the past two dinners. At home in New York City two days ago, I rummaged through a pile of imported, bruised, on-sale grapefruits trying to find one that was a decently grapefruit-y color and shape. Last week, back in Evanston, I attended a benefit dinner cooked out of grocery store food waste. The food would have been thrown away had it not been for the two high schoolers who collected the food for their class project (and then created a gorgeous, delicious meal out of it).

 

Clearly, these experiences touch upon a lot of different topics and provoke a lot of wide-ranging question, but there are also an infinite number of stories and dilemmas that quietly transpire along with every bite of food each one of us ever takes. The world of food is quite a complicated one, just like the world itself. Urban food networks consist of community organizations and government policy and capitalism, scarce natural resources and expensive man-made ones, and lots of hungry people with different dietary requirements, incomes, and cultural norms. From Kampala to Tokyo to Rosario, the incredible variety of forms of food culture I’m sure I will encounter will only allow me to engage with such a modest portion of all that there is out there to explore.

 

Sheesh, good thing this grant lets me go to so many countries!

Getting ready!

Hi, from… Wilmington, Delaware!

 

No, this isn’t one of the stops on my future circumnavigation, but I suppose it is apropos that I’m writing my first blog post while in transit (even if it’s for Spring Break travel)?

 

Anyhow, yes—it is Spring Break! A magical week of no classes, which I’ve been waiting so longingly for since I found out I received the Circumnavigators Travel-Study Grant about eleven weeks ago, now. Indeed, while a lot of my friends have been on tropical beaches, I’ve been on my computer applying for visas and filling out health insurance forms and making very long Airbnb ‘Wishlists.’ But despite that my arm still feels like it’s going to fall off a bit because of the yellow fever vaccine I got yesterday, there is very little room for complaining given this incredible opportunity I’ve been granted (no pun intended) and no doubt, amazing summer ahead.

 

With the generous funding I’ve received from the Circumnavigators Club of Chicago and Northwestern University, I will be traveling from the end of May through the beginning of September, to seven countries around the world. In Uganda, Italy, Hungary, Japan, Australia, and Argentina I will be conducting research on sustainable local food systems—the working title of my research is “From Local Farms to Urban Tables.” By studying the evolving and thriving local food systems in each city I visit—and the general socioeconomic dynamics of the city and its food systems—I seek to determine how local food systems can best be developed to foster urban food security.